Tuesday, 30 July 2013
Saturday, 27 July 2013
areas of physical science practicum in the revised B. Ed. syllabus- From the Scrap of official Document
SUGGESTED AREAS FOR PRACTICUM IN SEMESTER 1 AND 2 - PHYSICAL SCIENCE
·
Adequacy of the strategies for developing process
skills
· Assessment of Utilization of Resources at practicing schools like Science Laboratory, Science Library, Computer lab, Multimedia facility
· Attitude of Science teachers towards:CCE, Activity /Problem based approaches, Online
learning, Individualizing Science learning
· Availability and utility of e- learning resource in schools
· Awareness on energy conservation among secondary school students
· Case Analysis of Best practices in Science learning in the practicing schools
· Case study of community based science learning resources
· Comparative Analysis of Readers across different streams on the basis of Principle of Curriculum Organisation
· Concept map designing of science content from selected units
· Conceptual Understanding Analysis of Science Concepts among student teachers
· Development of riddles with Graphic illustration to popularize science among students and public
· Digital Science Learning Resource Analysis across the globe
· Error Analysis and remediation of Content Organization in Selected Units of prescribed readers
· Facility analysis of Science Library and labs of practicing schools with respect to the existing curriculum
· Identification of Strategies adopted for CCE by teachers at the practicing schools
· Innovative practices adopted in Science learning in the practicing schools
· Institutional Profile Analysis of Prestigious laboratories and Organizations in Science and Science Education of National and International Significance
· Interview with eminent dignitaries in Science, Technology, Research and Science Education
· Involvement in Science exhibition and other activities
· Learning resource material design and development like modules, instructional packages, CDs etc.
· Lesson Template Comparison of from net based digital resources
· MCQ question bank of different units in the revised Physical Science Syllabus
· Mnemonics Bank designing for selected units in Physics and Chemistry
· Proposal Development for innovative designing of science classrooms and science promotion centers for local self government institutions
· Puzzle making for Process Skills and Thinking Skills promotion
· Readability index analysis of selected units of reads from different streams using Digital Fog Index calculator
· Role analysis of Science club activities in developing Scientific attitude
· Role of Improvisation in developing thinking skills
· Strategies adopted by Science teachers in managing inclusive classrooms by teachers in schools
· Suitability of Learning Materials provided at the school/educational system
· Text Book Quality assessment using Vogel’s Spot Check Schedule
· You-Tube or Chem.-Tube downloading of video clippings for science learning, its translation and recording in regional language
· Assessment of Utilization of Resources at practicing schools like Science Laboratory, Science Library, Computer lab, Multimedia facility
· Attitude of Science teachers towards:
· Availability and utility of e- learning resource in schools
· Awareness on energy conservation among secondary school students
· Case Analysis of Best practices in Science learning in the practicing schools
· Case study of community based science learning resources
· Comparative Analysis of Readers across different streams on the basis of Principle of Curriculum Organisation
· Concept map designing of science content from selected units
· Conceptual Understanding Analysis of Science Concepts among student teachers
· Development of riddles with Graphic illustration to popularize science among students and public
· Digital Science Learning Resource Analysis across the globe
· Error Analysis and remediation of Content Organization in Selected Units of prescribed readers
· Facility analysis of Science Library and labs of practicing schools with respect to the existing curriculum
· Identification of Strategies adopted for CCE by teachers at the practicing schools
· Innovative practices adopted in Science learning in the practicing schools
· Institutional Profile Analysis of Prestigious laboratories and Organizations in Science and Science Education of National and International Significance
· Interview with eminent dignitaries in Science, Technology, Research and Science Education
· Involvement in Science exhibition and other activities
· Learning resource material design and development like modules, instructional packages, CDs etc.
· Lesson Template Comparison of from net based digital resources
· MCQ question bank of different units in the revised Physical Science Syllabus
· Mnemonics Bank designing for selected units in Physics and Chemistry
· Proposal Development for innovative designing of science classrooms and science promotion centers for local self government institutions
· Puzzle making for Process Skills and Thinking Skills promotion
· Readability index analysis of selected units of reads from different streams using Digital Fog Index calculator
· Role analysis of Science club activities in developing Scientific attitude
· Role of Improvisation in developing thinking skills
· Strategies adopted by Science teachers in managing inclusive classrooms by teachers in schools
· Suitability of Learning Materials provided at the school/educational system
· Text Book Quality assessment using Vogel’s Spot Check Schedule
· You-Tube or Chem.-Tube downloading of video clippings for science learning, its translation and recording in regional language
Friday, 19 July 2013
Thanks, Thanks, Thanks...
A WORD OF SINCERE APPRECIATION CUM THANKS IS EXPRESSED TO ALL THOSE WHO HAVE COLLABORATED WITH THE B.Ed. CURRICULUM REVISION PROCESS OF UNIVERSITY OF KERALA. THE REVISED CURRICULUM DOCUMENT UNDER PRINTING WILL BE OFFICIALLY RELEASED BY THE UNIVERSITY VERY SOON. ALL VISITORS OF THE BLOG ACROSS THE WORLD REQUIRES A SPECIAL MENTION. YOUR CONSTANT SEARCH HELPED US A LOT. KEEP IN TOUCH WITH IN FUTURE ALSO. A BIG THANKS TO ALL!
SAMPLE RUBRIC FOR PRACTICE TEACHING EVALUATION
SAMPLE RUBRIC FOR PRACTICE TEACHING EVALUATION FROM QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY FREE pdf DOCUMENT
Practicum Assessment Rubric
This rubric is intended to assist both the
Teacher Candidate and the Associate Teacher
in making judgements
about demonstrated levels of teaching proficiency. Teacher Candidates and Associate Teachers should approach this assessment based on reasonable expectations for a Teacher
Candidate at this
particular point in
her/his BEd Year. Please note that Teacher Candidates working primarily at the
“Marginal” level are not currently meeting the required expectations for professional practice
required by Queen’s
University.
If a Teacher
Candidate’s one-page interim report indicates
3 or more areas in Focus
for Improvement, the Faculty
Liaison will initiate a Practicum Review Form. Faculty Liaisons,
Associate Teachers and Candidates will negotiate appropriate
next steps.
Elements of
Practice
|
No Opportunity
to Demonstrate
|
Marginal
|
Satisfactory
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
I – Professionalism
|
|||||
1.
Initiative &
dependability
|
|
Does not actively seek direction or requires monitoring to assure completion
of assigned tasks
|
Is dependable
in completing formally assigned classroom responsibilities
|
Effectively assumes
appropriate degree
of responsibility for the classroom; takes initiative
to contribute to students’ learning in many ways
|
Makes an outstanding contribution
to teaching and learning
|
2. Discretion & professional judgement
|
|
Does not demonstrate
discretion appropriate
to the profession
|
Is not consistently discrete and professional in relation to classroom or school practices
|
Uses appropriate professional judgement
and discretion in relation to interactions with
students; demonstrates sound judgement
in dealing with parents,
peers and colleagues
|
Analyzes and
adapts effectively to unexpected circumstances,
and changes in the classroom
situation; demonstrates
sophisticated judgement
in all situations
|
3. Response to mentorship
|
|
Requires continuous
coaching to connect Associate Teacher’s feedback to
the improvement of teaching
practice
|
Incorporates Associate Teacher-initiated feedback to enhance teaching and
learning
|
Invites and incorporates Associate Teacher feedback about improving teaching practices ;
demonstrates progress
towards teaching and learning
goals; uses self- reflection
and assessment information to inform next steps
for teaching practice
|
Is proactive in shaping,
revising, pursuing and
demonstrating professional growth
during the practicum
|
Elements of
Practice
|
No
Opportunity to Demonstrate
|
Marginal
|
Satisfactory
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
II – Supporting a Community of Learners
|
|||||
1.
Promoting a safe and trusting learning community
|
|
Is unaware
of how students’ disruptive behaviour is affecting
their learning
|
Addresses student behaviours
that interrupt or jeopardize the
teaching and learning context
inconsistently
|
Demonstrates
skill and consistency in
using routines and monitoring classroom behaviours in order
to maintain a safe and supportive
classroom for all students
|
Demonstrates
a high degree of skill and consistency in monitoring classroom behaviours
in order to maintain a safe and supportive classroom environment for all students
|
2.
Promoting student independence
|
.
|
Does not allow
students to make decisions about
learning or classroom
activities independent
of her/his approval
|
Provides students with options
in how to proceed in their learning; does not
use appropriate strategies for following
up
|
Structures learning
so that students learn to identify their strengths and weaknesses,
make decisions about next
steps, and monitor their progress towards expectations
|
Guides students in setting goals; making and implementing
decisions about use of time and resources; collecting and using
feedback; as well as representing and critiquing their learning
|
III – Planning and
Preparing
|
|||||
1. Use of curriculum
documents
|
|
Creates activities with
no apparent reference or connection
to Ontario curriculum documents
|
Creates learning activities with occasional reference to relevant Ontario curriculum expectations
|
Creates learning activities using the appropriate curriculum
expectations in ways
that provide engaging
learning for all
students; demonstrates sound knowledge
of appropriate subject matter
|
Creates an integrated set of
learning activities that can
be mapped on to a set of
general and specific expectations located
in one or more curriculum areas, strands or subheadings
|
2. Sequencing of steps in a lesson or unit
|
|
Develops
sequences
in lessons in a random, inappropriate
way
|
Creates lessons in
a way that is beginning to show
consistent attention to students’ previous
learning
|
Creates developmentally appropriate
lessons in a way that connects
students’ prior knowledge
to appropriate next steps and new learning; plans
for appropriate student involvement and follow-up
activities
|
Sequences lessons
so that critical knowledge and skills
are revisited in different ways, in different contexts
and at different times
|
3.
Differentiation
|
|
Does not consider students’ learning and
development levels; does not
provide differentiation in lessons
or assessment
|
Structures differentiated learning activities inconsistently
|
Designs learning and
assessment activities that are deliberately differentiated based
on students’ needs;
demonstrates understanding of use of appropriate accommodations
and modifications for individual
students
|
Designs learning and
assessment activities that are deliberately
differentiated based on
students’ interests and needs;
demonstrates sophisticated understanding
of student development
|
4. Resources
|
|
Relies
on associate teacher to identify all
instructional resources
|
Uses a limited but additional
range of independently selected teacher and student resources
|
Gathers from others
or creates appropriate
resources to support the
intended teaching, learning
and assessment
|
Engages
students in creating,
locating and critiquing specific
resources for learning; uses a wide
range of high quality resources
to support the development
of information literacy skills
|
Elements of
Practice
|
No
Opportunity to Demonstrate
|
Marginal
|
Satisfactory
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
IV. Lesson
Presentation
|
|||||
1.
Instructional strategies
|
|
Uses a limited number
of strategies without
reference to student needs,
the curriculum or current research
into effective teaching
|
Uses few appropriate
teaching strategies to match curriculum
and needs of students; ignores current research into effective
practices
|
Uses a wide variety of appropriate teaching/learning strategies based on
student interests and needs, as
well as current research
on effective teaching practices
|
Uses with
great skill a wide
variety of appropriate teaching and
learning strategies based
on student interests, needs, development
levels and
current research
on effective teaching practices
|
2. Lesson management
|
|
Does not employ appropriate
lesson management strategies to deal with
materials, time and activities
|
Uses appropriate lesson management strategies for materials, timing and learning
activities inconsistently;
|
Uses a variety of effective strategies for managing materials,
time, and learning
activities to meet the needs of all learners
|
Demonstrates
sophisticated grasp of effective
strategies for managing
materials, time and learning activities
to meet needs of all learners
|
3. Awareness
of classroom dynamics
|
|
Continues with plans
regardless of student responses; ignores evidence of student difficulties with a particular
strategy/lesson
|
Uses observations
of lesson effectiveness and
adjusts lessons occasionally; is unable to be
consistent in adapting
lessons during their implementation stage
|
Adjusts or modifies teaching and
learning activities based
on student responses; works
to engage students both in the learning and with
each other
|
Observes difficulties in student understanding and knows
how to adjust lessons to respond effectively to the
situation; is consistently able to observe and modify activities to
match student needs during lessons
|
4.
Appropriate and effective use of language
|
|
Uses language in ways that are unacceptable for students to model and understand; does not use effective questioning
|
Uses language and
questioning in inconsistent ways for modeling purposes
and to support student learning
|
Expresses
ideas,
directions and options clearly;
models a standard for oral and written
work; uses effective questioning to extend learning
and effectively uses strategies such as wait time and checking for understanding to engage all students.
|
Uses exemplary
language; uses questioning, directions, written and oral communications in a sophisticated way to engage
all students in learning
|
Elements of
Practice
|
No
Opportunity to Demonstrate
|
Marginal
|
Satisfactory
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
V. Assessment
|
|||||
1. Assessment for
learning
|
|
Uses assessment results primarily to make judgements about
students’ achievement
and potential for learning
|
Uses student assessment
results as feedback for making decisions about
subsequent instruction and learning activities
|
Uses assessment to monitor how students’ learning is progressing and
to help students focus their skill building
and academic growth
|
Creates the conditions and tools
necessary for a
combination of ongoing
self, peer and teacher feedback that helps students extend their learning in deep
and meaningful ways
|
2. Assessment as
learning
|
|
Keeps students dependent
on the teacher for approval of their thinking processes and their learning products
|
Encourages students to use assessment information to identify their
learning strengths and weaknesses
and to set short term curricular
and personal learning goals
|
Guides students in how they can use assessment information to
monitor their learning,
and track their progress
towards the achievement of curricular and personal
learning goals
|
Creates an environment where students use assessment information to determine or negotiate with the teacher the learning
processes and resources,
that best address their learning
needs and goals
|
3. Assessment of
learning
|
|
Makes judgements about students’ achievement based on
assessments that provide minimal or inadequate information
|
Creates and uses well designed assessment(s)
that contribute to adequate and
accurate judgements
about students’ achievement
of individual, specific learning
expectations
|
Creates and uses a variety of well-designed instruments to assess students’ learning and
describes their achievement
in relation to
well-defined
standards of performance
|
Aligns a variety of assessments with
curriculum expectations, instruction
and the individual needs of students, enabling judgements about student achievement to be accurate, transparent, and
equitable
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)