Tuesday 30 July 2013

PEER REVIEW WHEEL VERSION-1 FOR PEER EVALUATION OF PRACTICE TEACHING SESSIONS BY STUDENT-TEACHERS

A TOOL FOR PEER EVALUATION - COLOUR CODED PEER REVIEW WHEEL (CCPRW)


A Revised Version is in current use. Designed and owned with copyright by Dr. K.Y.Benedict and Team

Saturday 27 July 2013

areas of physical science practicum in the revised B. Ed. syllabus- From the Scrap of official Document



SUGGESTED AREAS FOR PRACTICUM IN SEMESTER 1 AND 2 - 
PHYSICAL SCIENCE

·         Adequacy of the strategies for developing process skills
·         Assessment of Utilization of Resources at practicing schools like Science Laboratory, Science Library, Computer lab, Multimedia facility
·         Attitude of Science teachers towards:  CCE, Activity /Problem based approaches, Online learning, Individualizing Science learning
·         Availability and utility of e- learning resource in schools
·         Awareness on energy conservation among secondary school students
·         Case Analysis of Best practices  in Science learning in the practicing schools
·         Case study of community based science learning resources
·         Comparative Analysis of Readers across different streams on the basis of Principle of Curriculum Organisation
·         Concept map designing of science content from selected units
·         Conceptual Understanding Analysis of Science Concepts among student teachers
·         Development of riddles with Graphic illustration to popularize science among students and public
·         Digital Science Learning Resource Analysis across the globe
·         Error Analysis and remediation of Content Organization in Selected Units of prescribed readers
·         Facility analysis of Science Library and labs of practicing schools with respect to the existing curriculum
·         Identification of Strategies adopted for CCE by teachers at the practicing schools
·         Innovative practices adopted in Science learning in the practicing schools
·         Institutional Profile Analysis of Prestigious laboratories and Organizations in Science and Science Education of National and International Significance
·         Interview with eminent dignitaries in Science, Technology, Research and Science Education
·         Involvement in Science exhibition and other activities
·         Learning resource material design and development like modules, instructional packages, CDs etc.
·          Lesson Template Comparison of from net based digital resources
·         MCQ question bank of different units in the revised Physical Science Syllabus
·         Mnemonics Bank designing for selected units in Physics and Chemistry
·         Proposal Development for innovative designing of science classrooms and science promotion centers for local self government institutions
·         Puzzle making for Process Skills and Thinking Skills promotion
·         Readability index analysis of selected units of reads from different streams using Digital Fog Index calculator
·         Role analysis of Science club activities in  developing Scientific attitude
·         Role of Improvisation in developing thinking skills
·         Strategies adopted by Science teachers in managing inclusive classrooms by teachers in schools
·         Suitability of  Learning Materials provided at the school/educational system
·         Text Book Quality assessment using Vogel’s Spot Check Schedule
·         You-Tube or Chem.-Tube downloading of video clippings for science learning, its translation and recording in regional language

Friday 19 July 2013

Thanks, Thanks, Thanks...

A WORD OF SINCERE APPRECIATION CUM THANKS IS EXPRESSED TO ALL THOSE WHO HAVE COLLABORATED WITH THE B.Ed. CURRICULUM REVISION PROCESS OF UNIVERSITY OF KERALA. THE REVISED CURRICULUM DOCUMENT UNDER PRINTING WILL BE OFFICIALLY RELEASED BY THE UNIVERSITY VERY SOON. ALL VISITORS OF THE BLOG ACROSS THE WORLD REQUIRES A SPECIAL MENTION. YOUR CONSTANT SEARCH HELPED US A LOT. KEEP IN TOUCH WITH IN FUTURE ALSO. A BIG THANKS TO ALL!

SAMPLE RUBRIC FOR PRACTICE TEACHING EVALUATION

SAMPLE RUBRIC FOR PRACTICE TEACHING EVALUATION FROM QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY FREE pdf DOCUMENT



Practicum Assessment Rubric

This rubric is intended to assist both the Teacher Candidate and the Associate Teacher in making judgements about demonstrated levels of teaching proficiency. Teacher Candidates and Associate Teachers should approach this assessment based on reasonable expectations for a Teacher Candidate at this particular point in her/his BEd Year.  Please note that Teacher Candidates working primarily at the “Marginal” level are not currently meeting the required expectations for professional practice required by Queen’s University.
If a Teacher Candidate’s one-page interim report indicates 3 or more areas in Focus for Improvement, the Faculty Liaison will initiate a Practicum Review Form.  Faculty Liaisons, Associate Teachers and Candidates will negotiate appropriate next steps.



Elements of
Practice

No Opportunity to Demonstrate



Marginal



Satisfactory



Good



Excellent
I Professionalism


1. Initiative &
dependability

Does not actively seek direction or requires monitoring to assure completion of assigned tasks
Is dependable in completing formally assigned classroom responsibilities
Effectively assumes appropriate degree of responsibility for the classroom; takes initiative to contribute to students’ learning in many ways
Makes an outstanding contribution to teaching and learning

2. Discretion & professional judgement

Does not demonstrate discretion appropriate to the profession
Is not consistently discrete and professional in relation to classroom or school practices
Uses appropriate professional judgement and discretion in relation to interactions with students; demonstrates sound judgement in dealing with parents, peers and colleagues
Analyzes and adapts effectively to unexpected circumstances, and changes in the classroom situation; demonstrates sophisticated judgement in all situations


3. Response to mentorship

Requires continuous coaching to connect Associate Teacher’s feedback to the improvement of teaching practice
Incorporates Associate Teacher-initiated  feedback to enhance teaching and learning
Invites and incorporates Associate Teacher feedback about  improving teaching practices ; demonstrates progress towards teaching and learning goals; uses self- reflection and assessment information to inform next steps for teaching practice
Is proactive in shaping, revising, pursuing and demonstrating professional growth during the practicum
  


Elements of
Practice

No Opportunity to Demonstrate



Marginal



Satisfactory



Good



Excellent
II Supporting a Community of Learners

1. Promoting a safe and trusting learning community

Is unaware of how students’ disruptive behaviour is affecting their learning
Addresses student behaviours that interrupt or jeopardize the teaching and learning context inconsistently
Demonstrates skill and consistency in using routines and monitoring classroom behaviours in order to maintain a safe and supportive classroom for all students
Demonstrates a high degree of skill and consistency in monitoring classroom behaviours in order to maintain a safe and supportive classroom environment for all students


2. Promoting student independence
.
Does not allow students to make decisions about learning or classroom activities independent of her/his approval
Provides students with options in how to proceed in their learning; does  not use appropriate strategies for following up
Structures learning so that students learn to identify their strengths and weaknesses, make decisions about next steps, and monitor their progress towards expectations
Guides students in setting goals; making and implementing decisions about use of time and resources; collecting and using feedback; as well as representing and critiquing their learning
III – Planning and Preparing


1. Use of curriculum documents

Creates activities with no apparent reference or connection to Ontario curriculum documents
Creates learning activities with occasional reference to relevant Ontario curriculum expectations
Creates learning activities using the appropriate  curriculum expectations in ways that provide engaging learning for all students; demonstrates sound knowledge of appropriate subject matter
Creates an integrated set of learning activities that can be mapped on to a set of general and specific expectations located in one or more curriculum areas, strands or subheadings

2. Sequencing of steps in a lesson or unit

Develops sequences
in lessons in a random, inappropriate way
Creates lessons in a way that is beginning to show consistent attention to students’ previous learning
Creates developmentally appropriate lessons in a way that connects students’ prior knowledge to appropriate next steps and new learning; plans for appropriate student involvement and follow-up activities
Sequences lessons so that critical knowledge and skills are revisited in different ways, in different contexts and at different times



3. Differentiation

Does not  consider students’ learning and development levels; does not provide differentiation in lessons or assessment
Structures differentiated learning activities inconsistently
Designs learning and assessment activities that are deliberately differentiated based on students’ needs; demonstrates understanding of use of appropriate accommodations and modifications for individual students
Designs learning  and assessment activities that are deliberately differentiated based on students’ interests and needs; demonstrates sophisticated understanding of student development



4. Resources

Relies on associate teacher to identify all instructional resources
Uses a limited but additional range of independently selected teacher and student resources
Gathers from others or creates appropriate resources to support the intended teaching, learning and assessment
Engages students in creating, locating and critiquing specific resources for learning; uses a wide range of  high quality resources to support the development of information literacy skills
  


Elements of
Practice

No Opportunity to Demonstrate



Marginal



Satisfactory



Good



Excellent
IV. Lesson Presentation


1. Instructional strategies

Uses a limited number of strategies without reference to student needs, the curriculum or current research
into effective teaching
Uses few appropriate teaching strategies to match curriculum and needs of students; ignores current research into effective practices
Uses  a wide variety of appropriate teaching/learning strategies based on student interests and needs, as well as current research on effective teaching practices
Uses with great skill a wide variety of appropriate teaching and learning strategies based on student interests, needs, development levels and
current research on effective teaching practices


2. Lesson management

Does not employ appropriate lesson management strategies to deal with materials, time and activities
Uses appropriate lesson management strategies for materials, timing and learning activities inconsistently;
Uses  a variety of effective strategies for managing materials, time, and learning activities to meet the needs of all learners
Demonstrates sophisticated grasp of effective strategies for managing materials, time and learning activities to meet needs of all learners


3. Awareness of classroom dynamics

Continues with plans regardless of student responses; ignores evidence of student difficulties with a particular strategy/lesson
Uses  observations of lesson effectiveness and adjusts lessons occasionally; is unable to be consistent in adapting lessons during their implementation stage
Adjusts or modifies teaching and learning activities based on student responses; works to engage students both in the learning and with each other
Observes difficulties in student understanding and knows how to adjust  lessons to respond effectively to the situation; is consistently able to observe and modify activities to
match student needs during lessons

4. Appropriate and effective use of language

Uses language in ways that are unacceptable for students to model and understand; does not use effective questioning
Uses language and questioning in inconsistent ways for modeling purposes and to support student learning
Expresses ideas, directions and options clearly; models a standard for oral and written work; uses effective questioning to extend learning and  effectively uses strategies such as wait time and checking for understanding to engage all students.
Uses exemplary language; uses questioning, directions, written and oral communications in a sophisticated way to engage all students in learning





Elements of
Practice

No Opportunity to Demonstrate



Marginal



Satisfactory



Good



Excellent
V. Assessment


1. Assessment for
learning

Uses assessment results primarily to make judgements about students’ achievement and potential for learning
Uses student assessment results as feedback for making decisions about subsequent instruction and learning activities
Uses assessment to monitor how students’ learning is progressing and to help students focus their skill building and academic growth
Creates the conditions and tools necessary for a combination of ongoing self, peer and teacher feedback that helps students extend their learning in deep and meaningful ways



2. Assessment as
learning

Keeps students dependent on the teacher for approval of their thinking processes and their learning products
Encourages students to use assessment information to identify their learning strengths and weaknesses and to set short term curricular and personal learning goals
Guides students in how they can use assessment information to monitor their learning, and track their progress towards the achievement of curricular and personal learning goals
Creates an environment where students use assessment information to determine or negotiate with the teacher the learning processes and resources, that best address their learning needs and goals



3. Assessment of
learning

Makes judgements about students’ achievement based on assessments that provide minimal or inadequate information
Creates and uses well designed assessment(s) that contribute to adequate and accurate judgements about students’ achievement of individual, specific learning expectations
Creates and uses a variety of well-designed instruments to assess students’ learning and describes their achievement in relation to
well-defined standards of performance
Aligns a variety of assessments with curriculum expectations, instruction and the individual needs of students, enabling judgements about student achievement to be accurate, transparent, and equitable